Comments on: Full versus Partial RSS Feeds

By: How to read a blog straight from your PC desktop: RSS feed tutorial for newbies and non-bloggers : OTWOMD | Bluepanjeet.Net

Sat, 08 Mar 2008 14:52:14 +0000

[...] Jaypee has a comparative anatomy between full feeds and partial feeds on his blog. I suggest you read it so that you can have an additional info about it. [...]

By: Jaypee

Jaypee — Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:15:36 +0000

@Bull3t – Yes, full feeds are more convenient and user-friendly because readers don’t have to go to the site to read the rest of the post. If the post is interesting, they would go and visit the blog to leave a comment or read other comments. :)

By: Bull3t

Bull3t — Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:10:22 +0000

I have used full feeds right from the word “go” on my blog, it makes it easier for readers to view the whole post from the feed. Also partial feeds and post excerpts are not my favourite of things, I have to say. Excerpts just don’t look very good in my opinion (and often don’t have the better part of the story, only the introduction).

By: Jaypee

Jaypee — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:16:36 +0000

@Michael – Thanks for sharing it with us. I’ll try to check it out later. :)

By: Michael

Michael — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:38:37 +0000

We've got a great write-up about this on our site as well, maybe even a heated debate. My take on it is that a full feed is much more pleasing to the user, and in the end it can only contribute to brand awareness and site loyalty. But dont take my word for it, we've got a bunch of opinions on the subject at www.AskTheAdmin.com